Search for: "Brown v. Jackson"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,035
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 4:50 pm
That is about what we got Wednesday with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s brief opinion for a unanimous court in McElrath v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in argued cases: Justice Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in McElrath v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:16 am
New York and 335-7 LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
And at least Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed to lean the other way. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization are correct that its quasi-originalist “history-and-tradition” approach is inconsistent with Brown v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Brown, by Andrew CoanThe ongoing debate over the Dobbs majority’s attempt to claim the mantle of Brown v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization cannot be squared with the Supreme Court's embrace of Washington v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
On Monday, February 12, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization about the February 8, 2024 oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Then, in August of 1954, three months after the Supreme Court issued its explosive decision in Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During the oral argument, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Ketanji Brown Jackson seemed enamored with the claim that Section 3 does not cover the Presidency, but other Justices focused on other issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:45 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
” That was the argument pushed by Justice Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Neil Gorsuch made a valiant but unsuccessful attempt to get Trump's attorney to address the other plausible off ramp for the Supreme Court in this case, which is the argument that Section 3 does not apply to the President of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Notably, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a Joe Biden nominee, said that the 14th Amendment provision did not include the word “president,” even though it specifically listed other officials who would be covered, such as members of Congress. [read post]
