Search for: "Browne v. NYS Court System"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 11:05 am
This case, called Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:01 am
This week, a new comp decision came down from the courts (Brown v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
– http://bit.ly/NkuEA1 (Press Release) Complete Discovery Source Named Number One E-Discovery Provider by New York Law Journal Survey – http://yhoo.it/NkEh1D (Press Release) Elumicor Announces Partnership with Index Engines to Offer Expanded Litigation Readiness Services – http://bit.ly/PLaEUo (PR Web) Enterprise Sales Veteran Youngjohns to Lead Autonomy – http://bit.ly/SzEscx (Evan Koblentz) Epiq Systems Announces 38% Dividend Increase – http://bit.ly/PMLoNt… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Brown, Brian Edward. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Brown, Brian Edward. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:02 am
Custodian-helpers hired by Custodian-enginers employed by the NYC Department of Education are not “building service employees” within the meaning of the Labor Law Brown v Liu, 2012 NY Slip Op 03567, Appellate Division, First Department Supreme Court dismissed an Article 78 petition seeking an investigation of wage complaints filed by certain members of Local 94 serving as "custodian-helpers" employed New York City Department of Education… [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 3:38 am
© 2012 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Crook, Anderson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am
Rabiej Leaves The Sedona Conference for Duke Law Center - bit.ly/xOirdg (Brendan McKenna) Keeping Your Outsourced Solution From Becoming A Problem - bit.ly/A61j6J (Joey Seeber, Shaun Yeh) Making The Most Of Delaware’s New eDiscovery Rules: Tips 1-5 - bit.ly/zQXx9T (Daniel Garrie) More Legal Issues about Privacy (and GPS) - bit.ly/xb9Apl (Peter Vogel) NY State Court adopts Zubulake Standard: Reasonable Anticipation of Litigation… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
The court actually cites Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
The court decisions “Browne v Medford Multicare” and “Smith v TWA, Inc” dealt with workers who refused return to modified work. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Citizens - http://bit.ly/vkPXsF (Gibbons) Watchdog (SEC) v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
– http://bit.ly/rINI9h (Gibbons) Airline E-mails Could Play a Big Part in Buffalo, NY Plane Crash Lawsuit - http://bit.ly/rt05By (Christopher Danzig) An eDiscovery Trick or Treat? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
The bad news is that they're still children, which is what makes the decision in Brown (having replaced Schwarzenegger) v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court, in Brown v. [read post]
