Search for: "Bruce Boyden" Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Stacey Dogan and Wendy Gordon, Functionality Dogan: Project: IP protection for product design more generally; functionality is a key concept here, and on the copyright side separability. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: can you interview people on the Hill at the time to see what they were talking about. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Commentator: Bruce Boyden: Even if countries agree that exclusive licensees have standing to sue, there are still issues with who counts as an exclusive licensee. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: another reason is that crafting a bespoke system takes years, making narrow legislation more likely to be out of date. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden, Marquette University Law SchoolSubstantial Similarity, from Equity to Legal ProcessMultistep tests as recent inventions. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:54 am
Last week's superb Blawg Review #147 by the world's foremost authority on North American badger law left me rather intimidated. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: if it’s an indirect infringement claim, does it change the analysis? [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: 9th Circuit screws this up. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: Is it private contracts driving the problem or the non-© restrictions? [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bruce Boyden: proportion of infringing uses can’t be the distinction; even if it’s substantially certain that infringement will occur, you can’t be sure which or when. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Seventh Breakout Session Liability and Digital Technology Steven Hetcher, Vanderbilt Law School The Death of Strict Liability in Copyright Proposal: Recognizing a fault standard for amateur-generated copyright. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Senior IP Scholar Session Paul Goldstein, Stanford Law School A lot of the industry-specific provisions of copyright have no present justification and should be tossed (e.g., cable licensing); mature industry likes settled rules, but that’s not good enough. [read post]