Search for: "Brush v. Condit" Results 61 - 80 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2018, 1:41 pm by Giles Peaker
(Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) [2015] UKSC 15 (our note)). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am by SW
The judge found that the conditions for exercise of the emergency powers had been met. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
"Although in Pennsylvania county commissioners "are the exclusive representative of management in representation proceedings and collective bargaining under [the Pennsylvania Employee Relations Act] involving court employees paid from county funds," the exclusive authority of county commissioners to negotiate "wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment," does not affect the inherent right of judges to hire, discharge and supervise court… [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am by Eleonora Rosati
" "The painter makes his own brush marks," while in music "sounds replace the lines and colour. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
There is an old saying that when a woman is forced to choose between two men, she opts for the third, and so it is with the Supreme Court’s decision in Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood, Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd, and Frost and others v MGN Ltd [2017] UKSC 33. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm by Unknown
(g) Recumbent bicycle means a bicycle in which the rider sits in a reclined position with the feet extended forward to the pedals.[43 FR 60034, Dec. 22, 1978, as amended at 68 FR 7073, Feb. 12, 2003; 76 FR 27888, May 13, 2011]§ 1512.3 Requirements in general.Any bicycle subject to the regulations in this part shall meet the requirements of this part in the condition to which it is offered for sale to consumers; any bicycle offered for sale to consumers in disassembled or… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:01 am by Rosalind English
All of the HMP Albany claims were made following publicity of the decision in Napier v The Scottish Ministers in April 2004, in which the Court of Session in Scotland held that the conditions at HMP Barlinnie (which included regular slopping out) breached the pursuer’s Article 3 rights. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 10:23 am by Dave
 Hillingdon’s argument, based on Ahmad v Newham LBC (that they don’t need a residual discretion any more) was brushed aside on the basis that this was not rationality challenge to the scheme, but an unlawful fettering of discretion: “The Ahmad case does not therefore provide a short answer to this part of the appeal, although it does require the court to think long and hard before finding that a local housing authority’s allocation policy is unlawful. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:35 pm
Well, emboldened by his brush with media celebrity, Mats has come forward with another piece. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm by Giles Peaker
Southwark Council v Various Lessees of the St Saviours Estate [2017] UKUT 10 (LC) (Full disclosure – my firm acted for the Lessees). [read post]