Search for: "Bull v. Bull"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 2:09 am
Oxford City Council v Bull [2011] EWCA Civ 609; [2011] WLR (D) 169 “Where the father of children who resided with their mother, from whom he was separated, allowed them to share his one-room accommodation, he became homeless intentionally, within the meaning of section 191(1) of the Housing Act 1996, on being evicted from that accommodation. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 10:46 am
In case you were wondering (and you were, weren’t you), the Oregon Supreme Court on April 1, 2010, decided:State of Oregon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:34 am
DUI v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:10 am
We now have a five-year track record in which there have been no fish v. human water conflicts on the Bull Run and the federal services have, so far, agreed that these flow release levels are adequate. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of K and AC Jackson and Son) v DEFRA – read judgment. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:17 pm
I haven't read this new white paper yet from the Media Law Resource Center (it's about 200 pages long), but it seems quite interesting; here's the Table of Contents [UPDATE: link to paper fixed]: Preface • iii Floyd Abrams Introduction and Executive Summary • 1 Chapter 1: A Response to Justice Thomas • 9 Matthew Schafer Chapter 2: A Response to Justice Gorsuch • 79 Richard Tofel and Jeremy Kutner Chapter 3: The Empirical Reality… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm
Among the presentations being offered at the annual meeting are: • Recent case law developments; • A look at patent landscaping and analysis; • Legal issues surrounding genetic information research and development; • Damages; • Current state of the ITC; • Patentability issues; • Recent developments in patent offices around the world; and • Ethical questions arising from en banc review of… [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:04 pm
LAW & DISORDER Performing Arts Division May 15, 2024 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: • A National Ban on Non-Compete Agreements • Paid v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:46 pm
In one recent federal civil case, Bostick v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 9:18 am
The conference will offer presentations on the following topics: • Proposed Hatch-Waxman Reform Measures including live audience polling • The Fate of "Skinny Labeling" at the Supreme Court in GSK v Teva • The Relationship between Written Description and Enablement in view of Biogen v Mylan • Patent Eligible Subject Matter after the Supreme Court Denied Cert in American Axle v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm
In the recent domain name dispute of Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:06 am
In Tracey v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
The court reversed course and decided that the ruling should only apply to purebred dogs in Tracey v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
The court reversed course and decided that the ruling should only apply to purebred dogs in Tracey v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:17 pm
The categories are as follows: • Category I: 0 or 1 points • Category II: 2 or 3 points • Category III: 4 through 6 points • Category IV: 7 through 9 points • Category V: 10 through 12 points • Category VI: 13+ points Irrespective of the offense in question - or the adjustments in base offense level that a judge may choose to make - the criminal history can be critical. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 8:18 pm
ACI faculty will offer presentations on the following topics: • Regulatory and Legislative Developments Impacting the Biopharmaceutical Industry • Satisfying Section 112 Requirements and the Future of Genus Claims • The "Skinny Label" Post-GSK v Tevaregarding Biosimilar Carve-Outs • Litigation Strategies for Challenging Reference Drug Patents in IPRs • The Role of ITC in Biotech Litigation • The… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 8:34 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Oklahoma v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:19 pm
CHADWICK DAVID DORMAN MOYER v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:59 pm
The conference will allow attendees to: • Preserve privilege and confidentiality in freedom to operate opinions; • License your way out of trouble; • Analyze smart freedom to operate game plans post-America Invents Act; • Evaluate the effects of the recent Mayo v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:38 pm
Overlawyered comment where I found the study An overview of dog bite cases in Maryland Premises liability cases in Maryland Tracey v. [read post]
