Search for: "Burke v State of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Georges Reus, et al., Index No. 653439/2015 (Sup Ct., New York County 2015). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 99205 (SD NY, Sept. 21, 2010), a New York federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that a group strip search violated his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA, finding insufficient evidence of a substantial burden on plaintiff's religious beliefs.In Garcia v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am by Rob Robinson
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
" ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, CIVIL PROCEDURE, COMMERCIAL LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW New York Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Allied Part 2: “Clean Up” of Compromising Social Media Evidence Can Result in Severe Sanctions -bit.ly/zrKTaS (K&L Gates) Letter, Reassess, Repeat: Avoiding Privilege Waiver After Notice of Inadvertent Production of Documents – bit.ly/ydBJGg (Mark Kaddis) New Wage and Hour Class Action Decision Broadens Obligation To Preserve Documents - bit.ly/zlq8HF (Fulbright & Jaworski) NLRB General Counsel Issues Second Report on Social Media Cases | Employment… [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
This principle, articulated by the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals, in the Alison D. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
Circuit Judge Rosemary Pooler of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and he then practiced law at Davis Polk & Wardwell and Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP, both in New York City. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The Court stated that the instant case was clearly distinguishable from other cases in which the Court has upheld non-consensual searches under Article I, Section 4.United States Constitution: The Court stated that the search clearly fell within the purview of New York v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The Court stated that the instant case was clearly distinguishable from other cases in which the Court has upheld non-consensual searches under Article I, Section 4.United States Constitution: The Court stated that the search clearly fell within the purview of New York v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the determination of the maximum enlargement of the building permissible under New York law was the type of determination that required specialized knowledge, and thus, that expert evidence testimony was required to determine whether the defendants exercised due care in making that determination (see 530 E. 89 Corp. v Unger, 43 NY2d at 777; Michael v He Gin Lee Architect Planner, PLLC, 153 AD3d 704). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 8:00 am by Eugene Volokh
{Although this action was transferred to this District from New York, the Court continues to apply New York substantive law to Plaintiffs' state law claims, including Plaintiffs' damages requests. [read post]