Search for: "Burke v. Department of Justice" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Chiappari is a partner at Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke in New York City. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner) Opinion below (8th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-1175 Case name: Burke, et al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
[He] claims it was not until this Court issued its decision in Lewis–Burke Assocs., LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 10:36 pm
Sanguinary atrocity by a non-state agency is no paradigm at all to justify burking the offender based on the blood-thirsty retributive justice commandment. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 10:39 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Burke asked whether that was why no fee petition had been filed before the Commission. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm by Edward A. Fallone
In arguing what the law is, our state institutions charged with the administration of justice – and I would include here both the courts and the department of justice among those institutions –  should strive to adopt legal positions that , to borrow a phrase from Edmund Burke, “afford both certainty and stability to the laws. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:57 am by Meg Martin
Burke delivered the decision.C.J. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Burke, Cavalier, Lindy and Engel P.C., 202 A.D.2d 929, 930, 610 N.Y.S.2d 888, 889 (N.Y. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration (06-1210). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:50 pm
Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller said it was too early for the government to respond -- given it hasn't even seen the suit yet. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
This Court has explained: "It is axiomatic that the courts must be independent and must not be subject to the whim of either the executive or legislative departments. [read post]