Search for: "Burns v. United States of America"
Results 61 - 80
of 316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:39 am
To unite the country. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
That's Burns v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 12:55 pm
The proposed constitutional amendment is one sentence: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm
Sapp v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am
The United States still struggles to find effective policies for deterring cyberattacks. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:10 am
Two days later, [he] flew back to the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm
In the appointment letter, Kosinki designates Burns to “perform the duties of United States District Judge temporarily for the District of Arizona for the specific case United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am
A Ku Klux Klan cross was burned on his front lawn. [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:51 am
Some, most notably those who are either law nerds or untroubled by the substance, will raise the shock that a draft opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States was leaked to Politico. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 3:41 am
In the ensuing case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
v=Sx0vvn_Wn8o [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Ohio: Burns v. [read post]
