Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows"
Results 61 - 80
of 292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
But this Supreme Court judgment should be the last time the Supreme Court is troubled by the legacy of Thompson v Elmbridge Borough Council [1987] 1 WLR 1425 and Burrows v Brent London Borough Council [1996] 1 WLR 1448. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:24 am
[Jackson] A postmortem on Burrow v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 9:38 am
In Burrows v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm
It invoked Burrow-Giles Lithographic v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 7:31 am
So - having created the nonsense of tolerated trespassers in LB Brent v Burrows [1996] 1 WLR 1148, lets see if their Lordships can finally sort it out. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:01 am
Burrows, 2012-Ohio-5995 (9th Dist.) [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint, finding that these allegations, even if proven, would not entitle the plaintiff to relief pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d at 1225-1226; Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [2014]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows &… [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 4:58 am
In the Supreme Court, Lord Kerr, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen, Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows heard the matter. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
Lord Burrows emphasises that the purpose of the advice or information is of central importance. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:49 am
Actual caselaw is scarce, with Bridgeman Art Library v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am
In support of their motion, the defendants submitted the transcript of the court proceeding setting forth the terms of the settlement of the underlying action, which conclusively established that the plaintiff was not coerced into settling (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, 14 AD3d 545; Laruccia v Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino & Cohn, 295 AD2d 321, 322). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Knowsley HT v White, Honeyghan-Green v LB Islington & Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] UKHL 70 - for anyone who hasn’t read it yet. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:17 am
Burrows, 167 F.3d 1007 (6th Cir. 1999). [read post]
5 May 2021, 9:07 am
In Gulati v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 6:45 am
” (See Burrows v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Thomas, Burrow-Giles v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
From Borkowski v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 pm
PCT/GB01/00901 to Burrow (“Burrow reference”). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:34 am
“Moreover, the plaintiff failed to plead specific factual allegations showing that, had he not settled, he would have obtained a more favorable outcome” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; see Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d at 1083; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293; Rau v… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 3:47 am
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action for violations of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Ehrenkranz v 58 MHR, LLC, 159 AD3d 872, 872; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759). [read post]
