Search for: "Bush v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 61 - 80 of 526
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
If he thinks the prison at Guantanamo still has a role in national security or that it provides some benefit to the United States, I welcome his views. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am by Lawson Fite
Bush administration from recognizing and responding to the threat posed by al-Qaeda. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
In 2020, that deadline is December 8, since the college votes on December 14, 2020 Elections contested in court (until December 14) While in most cases any dispute at a state level must be resolved by December 8, back in 2000 a divided Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, ruled on December 12 in Bush v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The Court will not want a repeat of the calamitous decision in Bush v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm by Marcia Coyle
The late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who often was in dissent in the court’s 5-4 decisions each term, once offered what seemed to be a message not just about the court but for all Americans when they believe the court is “out of whack” in whatever direction: Referring to her late husband, Ginsburg remarked, “Marty used to say the true symbol of the United States is not the bald eagle. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And luckily for America, there are no non-brazen routes by which the Republicans could keep Trump (and themselves) in power.To be sure, we all have seared in our memories the shamelessness of Bush v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Scott Anderson, Suzanne Maloney, Natan Sachs and Hady Amr spoke about the meaning of the deal for the domestic political environments of Israel, Iran and the United States, its potential impact on the Palestinians and how the agreement could change regional dynamics more broadly: Daniel Byman discussed how a new administration could more effectively combat rising white supremacist violence in the United States. [read post]