Search for: "Butler v. Supreme Judicial Court" Results 61 - 80 of 161
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  2022 NY Slip Op 31706(U) May 25, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156946/2020 Judge: David B. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in the Hyle v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
See, for example,  PNM v Times Newspapers, heard by the Supreme Court this week. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Case may be working its way up to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm by Jane Chong
She goes on to apply the two-prong “experience and logic” test from the 1986 Supreme Court case Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
Alleged judicial Islamophobia was an issue in Farid el Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 888. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:24 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court, along with a companion case that Mullen had been litigating, Evangelical Lutheran Synod v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
The class action world is abuzz with discussion of Judge Posner’s recent opinion for the Seventh Circuit in Butler v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 4:08 pm
 Anyway. this is what you missed last week:* The Key to Confusion: Supreme Court of BC decides on Keyword Advertising and Passing OffJani recounts the tale of Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College 2015 BCSC 1470, a challenging case concerning a trade mark used as keyword in online advertising which just decided by the Supreme Court of British Columbia.* Draft consultation on online platforms leaked: does the EU really want… [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Post’s brilliant typology reveals that none of the four leading justices on the Taft Court considered themselves originalists or textualists as those terms are used on the Supreme Court today. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am by Ben
” But a 1903 ruling from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes might give some hope to Hall and Butler:  “It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only to the law to constitute themselves final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations, outside of the narrowest and most obvious limits” Holmes wrote . [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm by David Kopel
Butler (1936), adopted the broader, Hamiltonian reading. [read post]
15 May 2007, 8:26 am
The justices of the Supreme Court have historically included people who seemed, even during their service, to be genuine visionaries. [read post]