Search for: "C/O Does No. 1-30"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 3:07 am
He was awarded the NJ State State Bar Municipal Court Practitioner of the Year. .... in section 2 of P.L.1987, c.116 (C.30:4-27.2), that does not require institutionalization, the court shall order the defendant to be provided appropriate treatment in the jail or prison in which the defendant is incarcerated. ... [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 10:21 am
§1504(c)]: A claim for copyright infringement, where the total monetary recovery sought does not exceed $30,000 [17 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
Doe 1 and disagreement with Elektra v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:53 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 8:18 pm
” Id. at *30. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
§ 3142(c)(1) requires the “unconditional” payment of the prevailing wage without deduction or rebate…. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:03 pm
The D&O insurance policy defined the term claim to mean, in relevant part, as “1. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
I therefore hereby proclaim the following: Section 1. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
C. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf) John F. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:38 am
O’Dea v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:38 am
O’Dea v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 2:20 pm
It includes the text of the draft (O'Brien, Claire. (2020). [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 2:25 am
O'Hara Corp., 2008 WL 2558015, at *1 (E.D. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:59 pm
`(c) Inapplicability to Military Commissions Under Chapter 47A- This section does not apply to a military commission established under chapter 47A of this title. [read post]
3 May 2019, 9:49 am
Probability of choice w/o marketing stimulus: brand effect. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The EBA has noted further that “[T]o restrict the application of R 28(c) (formerly R 23d(c)) to what an applicant chooses explicitly to put in his claim would have the undesirable consequence of making avoidance of the patenting prohibition merely a matter of clever and skilful drafting of such claims” (see point [22] of the Reasons). [21] The present Board does not see any reason to apply this approach of decision G 2/06 to the situation underlying… [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:23 pm
Too busy carving those jack-o'-lanterns? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
The Court observed that foster parents apply for the subsidy prior to adoption (18 NYCRR 421.24 [b], [c][1]), and sign a contract with ACS (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][3]). [read post]
