Search for: "C/O Harper"
Results 61 - 80
of 94
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2011, 7:24 am
However, the IRS has noted that, “[t]o have a theft loss, there needs to be some evidence of criminal theft. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:17 pm
” Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
O'Hear. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:00 pm
O'Connell Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 11:36 am
O'Sullivan, David P. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:14 am
Newton (Excess Copyright) (IPblog) Putting statutory damages in perspective (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Macleans on C-32 & Fair Dealing: Claims of rampant copying ‘grossly exaggerated’ (Michael Geist) Opening remarks to the Legislative Committee on Bill C-32 (IP Osgoode) NDP MP Angus calls for compromise on Bill C-32 (Michael Geist) C-32’s Fair Dealing (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Sorting through the Copyright Levy proposals… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:02 am
Ficsor (Excess Copyright) (Excess Copyright) C-32 Legislative Committee, Day 1 and 2; and Michael Geist appearance (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist) Bill C-32 Legislative Committee formed (Michael Geist) Music Publisher Ole Criticizes C-32 (Michael Geist) Quebec artists travel to Ottawa to protest C-32 (Michael Geist) Q. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:38 am
Rep. 01 Ivy Harper (D) C Lost U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 9:56 pm
Admission to a nursing home, skilled nursing facility, or hospice c. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:04 pm
” Harper Row, Publishers Inc v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm
“[C]opyright is not about virtue; it is about the encouragement of creative output, including the output of transformative quotation. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:10 am
Pilley of Harper Grey LLP. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
O'Brien (C.D. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:33 am
Two cases illustrate the divide, Hill Harper v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
History: L. 1978, c. 95; amended 1980, c. 112, § 2; 1981, c. 290, § 18; 1995, c. 20, § 3; 2009, c. 283, § 2, eff. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California: Dancing tot… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California: Dancing tot… [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
Pilley of Harper Grey. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:54 am
While both motions passed, their recommendations were non-binding and never implemented by the minority Conservative government under the leadership of Stephen Harper. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
"] O'Connell, D.P. [read post]
