Search for: "C. B. Restaurants, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
The worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and C. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:54 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
., 43:21-1 to 24.4, deems individuals eligible for unemployment compensation benefits unless all of the criteria of the so-called “ABC test” set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-19(i)(6)(A),(B),(C) is satisfied. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The California Supreme Court has provided three alternative definitions of “employer” within the meaning of California Wage Order No. 5-2001: “(a) to exercise control over the wages, hours or working conditions, or (b) to suffer or permit to work, or (c) to engage, thereby creating a common law relationship. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
., published by CDC, revealed that pork meat was the second most important source of foodborne Salmonella outbreaks.[6] In pork meat, pigs and swine, and the swine farm environment, the prevalence of Salmonella is 39.6%, 17.7%, and 7.9%, respectively.[7] Cargill, Inc., the largest private corporation in the United States,[8] has been implicated in several Salmonella outbreaks, particularly in ground beef and turkey products. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:38 am
Ruby Tuesdays Restaurants, Inc., 2007 WL 3125131, at *2 (S.D.Ohio Oct.23, 2007) (in Title VII employment action, "[e]mployment records are relevant to the issues of mitigation and damages[.] [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:35 am by Whittel & Melton, LLC
Anyone who ate at this restaurant during this period who have not been vaccinated for hepatitis A should consider getting vaccinated, said DOH officials. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Tenants Union, Inc., 42 Ohio St.2d 242, 245, 327 N.E.2d 753 (1975); and, again, appellate courts in other jurisdictions have reached the same result. [4.] [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
B. 1963MichiganConstitutionandSubsequent Court Rules The 1963 Constitution deleted the provision that a jury would have the right to review “the necessity for using such property” that existed in the prior constitutions. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:05 pm by Coral Beach
A day before the outbreak announcement from the CDC, a company called 165368 C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Joe Hand”), of Feasterville, Pennsylvania, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, MBK Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Matey’s Restaurant & Bar, of Michigan City, Indiana, Bryan Konieczny, and Mark Kehoskie, both individuals residing in Indiana, infringed its rights in the “UFC 202: Diaz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Judges derive insider trading violations from Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder (together known as the “SEC’s antifraud provisions”), and are a “catchall” aimed at fraud, requiring some sort of “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” or some action, which would otherwise “operate as a fraud or deceit upon a person. [read post]