Search for: "C. Chavez"
Results 61 - 80
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States, Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
§ 3582(c)(2), and, if so, how full the explanation must be. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
Navarro, April 2, 2018, Thomas, C.). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
IN SUPPORTArt Neill New Media RightsElizabeth Rosenblatt Organization for Transformative WorksJack Lerner, Brian Tamsut, and Jovan C. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:41 am
§ 3582(c)(2), and, if so, how full the explanation must be. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
§ 3582(c)(2), it must provide some explanation for its decision... [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
” In 2015, Chavez-Meza filed a pro-se motion under Section 3582(c)(2) asking the district court to modify his sentence. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:36 am
PROPOSED CLASS 1: Audiovisual Works—Criticism and Comment—E-Books and Filmmaking Michael C. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
’” And citing Chavez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:03 am
” Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm
Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am
Chavez-Meza v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Comment This decision was recently applied in Patel [2017] EWCA Civ 2028, where among other things the decision in Chavez-Vilchez (C-133/15, EU:C:2017:354, see here) was held not to alter the Zambrano doctrine and merely served as a reminder that the Zambrano principle had to be carefully applied focussing on whether the EU citizen child or dependant could remain in the UK in practice rather than in legal theory. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 10:00 am
Chavez-Salais, 337 F.3d 1170, 1173 (10th Cir. 2003) (same). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 6:20 am
After several months of working out the kinks in a soft launch, Just Liberty's Reasonably Suspicious podcast now is up and running on numerous platforms - iTunes, Google Play, YouTube, SoundCloud, etc.. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 5:32 am
¿Cómo hacemos esto? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
Benitez reviewed it carefully and found that is “tends to prove the opposite of a justification for § 32310 (c) & (d) [the confiscation statute], i.e., it tends to prove there is no need to dispossess and criminalize law-abiding responsible citizens currently possessing magazines holding more than 10 rounds. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:49 am
’” Chavez v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:30 pm
See, e.g., Chavez v. [read post]
