Search for: "C. L. v. Wilson et al" Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(IPKat) AG’s opinion in L’Oreal v Bellure: unfair advantage aspects; IBIL seminar materials online (IPKat) Forthcoming attractions at the ECJ (IPKat) ISP liability, copyright term extension key IP issues for Europe this year (Intellectual Property Watch) Extension of copyright on audio recordings from 50 to 95 years passed through Legal Affairs Committee (TorrentFreak) (Managing Intellectual Property) EU, not content to double music copyrights, now looks to… [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 10:30 am by E. coli Lawyer
AU: Andrews,-W-H; Wilson,-C-R; Poelma,-P-L; Romero,-A; Mislivec,-P-B SO: Applied-and-Environmental-Microbiology. 1979; 37(3): 559-566 ; 16 ref. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic choices:… [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
 After that elevation, her portfolio still includes Litigation Section III–run by a lawyer named David C. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
And most informed observers would agree, I think, that as a result of our government’s counterterrorism efforts, spanning both the Bush and Obama Administrations, and which have included targeted lethal force against known individuals, the U.S. homeland is safer today from a terrorist attack launched by al Qaeda from overseas. [read post]