Search for: "C. L. v. Wilson et al"
Results 61 - 74
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Wilson, et al, a 19-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:Ronald J. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
TED C. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 6:18 pm
RICK FOSTER, ET AL.; from Cooke County; 2nd district (02-07-00080-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02-07-08)08-0320 HWC WIRE & CABLE COMPANY v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Wilson v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), Domain name transfer made easier: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Quantum of obviousness in Australian patent laws - C Lawson: (IP Down Under), Separating Sony sheep from Grokster (and Kazaa) goats: Reckoning [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
, (Ars Technica), (Patent Prospector), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (IP Law Observer), (PLI), (PLI), (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog), (The Invent Blog), (IP Spotlight), (Just a Patent Examiner), (Techdirt), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patently-O), (IAM), (IP ThinkTank), (Against Monopoly), (Against Monopoly), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Ladas & Parry), Global Global - General Virtual monopoly – four strategic choices:… [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Allen, et aL, Nos. 2:06-cv-695-WKW, 2:06-cv-WKW, 2007 WL 4463489, Mem. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
Wilson, Sr., WIPO Case No. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
Meta-analytic reviews (Gallagher, Wilson, Hirshfield, Coggeshall, & MacKenzie, 1999; Hall, 1995; Hanson et al., 2002) offer a number of advantages over the earlier qualitative, narrative reviews. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
" Lake County Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:49 am
Snider, et al v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9… [read post]
