Search for: "C. et al v. Starr et al" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Sixth District Holds Coastal Commission’s Post-Approval Analysis of Coastal Development Permit’s Environmental Impacts Violates CEQA
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
California Coastal Commission (Heritage/Western Communities, Ltd., et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2021) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
California Supreme Court Holds Banning Ranch EIR Violates CEQA by Failing to Identify and Analyze Coastal Zone Project’s Impacts on Potential Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA); Declines to Reach General Plan Issues
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Newport Beach (Newport Banning Ranch LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA Statute Of Limitations Bars Citizens Group’s Challenge To College Of San Mateo Tree Cutting
23 Jun 2014, 10:20 am by Arthur F. Coon
San Mateo County Community College District, et al. (1st Dist. 6/17/2014) __ Cal.App.4th __, 2014, WL 2735052. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
General GWiR 20 February 2009 from IP Think Tank
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
Problems with Filters in the European Commission’s Platforms Proposal – Daphne Keller
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Earlier I posted about the European Commission’s Communication on Illegal Content Online. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Horse Of A Different Color: CEQA Does Not Require EIR Due To Psychological And Social Impacts From Closure Of Beloved Equestrian Boarding Facility In Small “Country” City
11 Mar 2016, 5:18 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Rogers, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2016) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2016 WL 891405. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting Challenge to CEQA Guidelines Class 32 Infill Development Exemption for 12-Unit Residential Condominium Project
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Lafayette, et al (3721 Land LLC, Real Party in Interest) (2024) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Law Library Acquisitions List - September 2010
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
[et al.]. [read post]
Trial Advocacy Blog - http://indexhtml.blogspot.com/
Supreme Disappointment: High Court’s Narrow Opinion In SANDAG RTP/SCS EIR Case Offers Little Guidance On CEQA GHG Analysis
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds CEQA Challenge To Shooting Range Project On City-Owned Land In Unincorporated County Was Not Mooted By Project’s Construction During Trial Court Proceedings Despite Petitioner’s Failure To Seek Preliminary Injunction
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Ukiah, et al. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Rejects CEQA Challenge To MND For Small Rural High School Project Based On Challenger’s Failure To Exhaust Available Administrative Appeal And On Merits
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Diego (Jan Dunning, et al, Real Parties In Interest) (2017) ___ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Valuation Issues in Eminent Domain Litigation: What You Need to Know
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Hilliard v. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/
A Teaching Moment? First District Affirms CEQA Action Demurrer Order Finding Late-Joined Developers of UC Berkeley Campus Project Were Necessary, But Not Indispensable, Real Parties In Interest
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The Regents of the University of California (Collegiate Housing Foundation, American Campus Communities, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2021) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Proposed CEQA Guidelines Amendments: A Critique of OPR’s “Preliminary Discussion Draft” (Part II – Proposed “Substance” and Major “Technical Improvements”)
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
Resources Code, § 25000 et. seq.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Remedies Go Both Ways:  Fourth District Reverses Judgment Upholding San Diego County Board’s Decision Granting Project Opponents’ Administrative Appeal, Holds Board Erred In Finding CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Statutory Exemption Inapplicable And Ordering EIR Prepared for Exempt Industrial Project
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm by Arthur F. Coon
., et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
In Writ Action Attacking Vesting Tentative Map Approval, Second District Holds Plaintiffs’ Failure to Comply With Subdivision Map Act Statute of Limitations’90-Day Service-Of-Summons Requirement Does Not Bar Major “Portion” of CEQA Cause of Action Alleging “Procedural Violations Unique to CEQA” And Other Claims That Could Not Be Brought Under Map Act
29 Oct 2024, 4:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A Review of Donald Trump’s Appellate Brief, and Amicus Briefs, Concerning the Appointment of Jack Smith as Special Counsel
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/