Search for: "CAMP v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am
Alaska State Employees Association, involving whether the nation’s largest state is doing enough to protect the First Amendment rights of state employee union members. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
Julie Tsirkin, Monica Alba, Frank Thorp V and Rebecca Kaplan report for NBC News. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:59 am
Facts: This case (Jones et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 12:26 pm
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Department of State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:02 pm
The case is Camp v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
Pix credit here DUKE. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 11:41 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Tribal Contract Health; Discovery) United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:17 am
Haney v. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 12:52 pm
Similarly, in “Camp v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:55 pm
City of Boise (9th Cir. 2019) 920 F.3d 584 (“Martin”) and Johnson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 11:04 am
Shands v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
It doesn't say on what grounds the judge thinks the plaintiffs, who are homeless people, may win; they claim violations of both the state and federal constitutions.Unless the judge changes her mind at some point, the injunction stays in place for as long as the case challenging the city camping ordinance is being litigated, which could take years. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:25 am
Published Decisions The Queen v. [read post]
