Search for: "CAROLINA v. MONTGOMERY"
Results 61 - 80
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
Arizona 15-8842Issue: (1) Whether a sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:28 am
Arizona 15-8842Issue: (1) Whether a sentencing judge's exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 11:22 am
Camp v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
North Carolina, 15-1194. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 5:31 am
On April 3, 2011, at approximately 6:03 a.m. the vehicle departed Dublin, and traveled through North and South Carolina and into Georgia, stopping in Midvale at about 12:33 p.m. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:19 pm
In Thomas v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:58 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court in Angle Joe Perrie Vasquez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"The ScotusWiki file for Connick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm
In States of Nevada; State of Texas; Alabama; Arizona; Arkansas; Georgia; Indiana; Kansas; Louisiana; Nebraska; Ohio; Oklahoma; South Carolina; Utah; Wisconsin; Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
And the Montgomery bus boycott of 1955–1956 was a major turning point in the struggle for civil rights in the Jim Crow South. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:00 pm
States and local jurisdictions have wasted no time implementing barriers to voting in Texas, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Alabama, and Ohio. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
Arizona 15-8842 Issues: (1) Whether a sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
North Carolina 14-593Issue: Whether the state of North Carolina performs an unconstitutional search when it requires a citizen to wear a GPS monitoring ankle bracelet for the rest of his life based only on the citizen's status as a recidivist sex offender and where there is no finding that he is a threat to society. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), and Brnovich v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
Toronto : Emond Montgomery, 2009 HV 9960 C2 W64 2009 Women and the criminal justice system : a Canadian perspective [edited by] Jane Barker. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
As both government briefs quickly note, in Michigan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:37 pm
., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Arizona 15-8842Issue: (1) Whether a sentencing judge's exercise of discretion not to impose a death sentence is the functional equivalent of the findings required under Montgomery v. [read post]
