Search for: "CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION"
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
In response to public outcry, the order instead requires the secretary of homeland security to detain immigrant families together “to the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations” and directs the Justice Department to amend the consent decree reached in Flores v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
” Written by Barry Berke of the law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Noah Bookbinder of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Brookings Senior Fellow Norm Eisen, the lengthy document makes the case that: There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:55 pm
” Written by Barry Berke of the law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, Noah Bookbinder of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Brookings Senior Fellow Norm Eisen, the lengthy document makes the case that: There are significant questions as to whether President Trump obstructed justice. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
The Trump Administration has distinguished itself throughout its brief duration as an unusually unruly and venomous collection of scorpions in a jar even by Washington standards. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Judgment was reserved On 27 June 2017 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of Alsaifi v Amunwa and Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror [2017] EWHC 1444 (QB) and Alsaifi v Amunwa [2017] EWHC 1443 (QB) As we have already mentioned, on 29 and 30 June 2017 the Administrative Court (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J) heard the judicial review application in the case of R (News Media Association) v Press Recognition Panel. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Three days after his inauguration, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a government accountability watchdog group, filed the first suit in the Southern District of New York. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 10:32 am
President Trump (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) On Jan. 23, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a progressive government watchdog organization, filed suit against President Trump alleging that he was violating the Constitution’s foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
The response, just about everywhere, was to read Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
Politico tells us that Ivanka Trump, who had promised that she would play no formal role in her father’s administration, has secured her own office in the West Wing, raising ethical concerns. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Sources: Trump’s DC hotel turns a loss, say Democrats Ethics Experts File Lawsuit Saying Trump’s Overseas Interests Violate Constitution Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
Yesterday’s assault may represent the regime’s commitment to clearing Aleppo before President-elect Donald Trump comes to office. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Circuit will hear oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Tim Cook’s Response to the Judge’s Order. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
