Search for: "CLARK v. DEPARTMENT OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
Raider Retreat Realty Co., involves whether, under federal admiralty law, a “choice-of-law” clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcing it would be contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:45 pm
Even though Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
– Occupational Health & Safety, February 14, 2010 The Environmental Protection Agency has settled with seven firms and individuals ac [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
In last year’s Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Archives can be found here and on The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
While traffic safety is an important interest, the Court concluded that the sex-based law restricting the purchase of one type of alcohol was not an accurate proxy for the regulation of driving, and thus not substantially related to increasing traffic safety [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Santosky v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
McKaig v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:45 am
A156A
Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation necessary to implement the public protection and general government budget for the 2009 - 2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
These employees include public safety officers, firefighters, public officials, and correctional officers. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
” Appeals Civil Litigation/Transportation Law: DisclosureCanada (Transportation Safety Board) v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Archives can be found there and on our blog, The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 12:54 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/18/07 referred to codes
LAW / CORRECTNSS99
DEFRANCISCO -- Prohibits the throwing, tossing or expelling of saliva, spit or sputum at or on a public employeeSUMM : Amd S240.32, Pen L Prohibits the throwing, tossing or expelling of saliva, spit or sputum at or on an employee of a correctional facility; such conduct shall be aggravated harassment of an employee. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
“Rule of Law Prevails in Sackett v. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
And in Houston v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
