Search for: "CLAYTON v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
In 1971, the court ruled in Griggs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Stated in the form of 13 individual guidelines for assessing M&A activity, the draft document reads like an outline of every way the FTC and DOJ might challenge a deal as meeting the Clayton Act’s prohibition: a transaction where the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:20 am
Clayton County. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Clayton County. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No Clayton Act violation. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Biden v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 10:02 am
[1] Clayton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 5:18 am
If you have questions or require assistance in complying with the Act, the BakerHostetler Labor and Employment Practice Group is here to help. [1] Clayton v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Washington v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
”Expert Statement Kellie Carter Jackson (Michael and Denise Kellen ‘68 Associate Professor of Africana Studies, Wellesley College) “Understanding the Historical Context for White Supremacist Violence in America in Tandem with the Events of January 6, 2021”Expert Statement Katherine Clayton (Ph.D. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:27 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
In Bostock v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
Clayton County (2020) (holding that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination violate Title VII), invoked the logic of Holcomb, as did the Seventh Circuit’s earlier opinion in Hively v. [read post]
