Search for: "COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY V US"
Results 61 - 80
of 222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
The question is whether the Commonwealth may permit providers to raise prices but prohibit them from using their invoices to say why without running afoul of the "freedom of speech" protections of the First (and Fourteenth) Amendment. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
(See Salsman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
As the Kentucky Court of Appeals noted last week in Valesquez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
The opinion is from the Court of Appeals of Kentucky: Kays v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 1:50 pm
See Randall v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 5:22 am
Morton v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:21 pm
See Ward v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:52 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 3:23 pm
Start with the claim under Commonwealth law—Kentucky's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm
Chan and Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:05 pm
We further note that the language found in the Fourth Amendment is nearly identical to that used in Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution, thus making federal caselaw analysis particularly relevant to our decision. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:17 pm
Although life in the Commonwealth has changed, the United States Constitution and the demands of Kentucky law have not. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm
Commonwealth Land Title Insura Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 09a0075n.06 Angela Dudley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm
Commonwealth Land Title Insura Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 09a0075n.06 Angela Dudley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Now, from the Kentucky AG's friend-of-the-court brief for the Commonwealth in Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
S.J.L.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Whether such government speech can be analyzed under doctrines used to evaluate government speech that purports to respect existing constitutional doctrine is problematic. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
The Kentucky Supreme Court's opinion can be accessed here (from the court's minutes, click on the link to the case Bowling v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:00 am
In 1927, the case of Willett v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
LEXIS 108455 (WD KY, Aug. 2, 2013), a Kentucky federal district court dismissed complaints by an inmate who is a member of the Moorish Science Temple of America that he is required to use the name under which he is convicted and not permitted to use "-El" after his surname. [read post]
