Search for: "COURT CASE" Results 61 - 80 of 606,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Despite this trend, the surge in claims doesn’t necessarily correlate with an increase in valid cases. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Getty v Schiavetta 2024 NY Slip Op 50697(U) Decided on May 18, 2024 Supreme Court, Westchester County Ondrovic, J. is a factually simple pro-se legal malpractice litigation with an interesting procedural twist. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
It’s not every day that New York’s highest court considers a question impacting the business divorce cases that we typically litigate. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
The EDVA district court had dismissed the case, reasoning that the Trademark Act precludes such an action, but the court of appeals held that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) permits judicial review. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The Justice Department went further in court by adding conspiracy to absurdity as part of its unhinged theory. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Franklin Investigation Reveals Employee Toll of Political Fights” by Cory McCoy (Tri-City Herald) for Yahoo News Lobbying National: “US Appeals Court Won’t Revive Foreign Agent Case Against Casino Mogul Wynn” by Andrew Goudsward (Reuters) for MSN Texas: “Ex-Legislator Faces Investigation for Possible Violation of Lobbying Law He Co-Sponsored” by Justin Miller for Texas Observer The post Monday’s LobbyComply News… [read post]
Last September, a Michigan court granted a doctor a preliminary court order, allowing him to bypass a noncompete he had signed with a local hospital system. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:20 am by Marty Hansen and Laura Somaini
On May 30, 2024, the Court of Justice of the EU (“CJEU”) handed down its rulings in several cases (C-665/22, Joined Cases C‑664/22 and C‑666/22, C‑663/22, and Joined Cases C‑662/22 and C‑667/22) concerning the compatibility with EU law of certain Italian measures imposing obligations on providers of online platforms and search engines. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:00 am by CAFE
As the Supreme Court continues to hand down consequential opinions this month, Morrison joins Preet to discuss the long-awaited decision concerning the abortion drug Mifepristone, and a second case concerning whether the First Amendment protects an individual's right to trademark the catchphrase "Trump too small. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
The case is being heard in a federal Denver court. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
However, in some cases, these orders may be issued unjustly, causing significant disruption to the lives of those accused. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 11:50 pm by David Pocklington
Disciplinary tribunal decisions & judgments from the Arches Court of Canterbury & Chancery Court of York are available from November 2007 [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 10:59 pm by Marcel Pemsel
But it can also help defend against earlier rights, as a recent decision from the General Court shows (case T-79/23). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And when they do, their cases rarely make it very far.Because the Supreme Court grants review mostly in cases presenting questions that have divided the lower courts, its docket has a selection bias for difficult cases, those in which plausible arguments can be made for a variety of results. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Second Appeal: DSC, Appeal No. 392/2024 of 4 June 2024 The case was sent back before the court of remand, which, in light of the decision of the DSC, decided to overturn the order declaring enforceable the Ontario judgment. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm by Stephen Halbrook
The statutory provision challenged in this case, the portion of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:43 pm by Tom Mayo
There isn't much to add to the voluminous media coverage of this case, in which the six conservatives on the Court struck down a 2018 BATF regulation that banned bump stocks because they turned semiautomatic rifles into machineguns, which Congress severely restricted in 1934 ( [read post]