Search for: "CP v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 656
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am by Daniel Jin
This approach is supported by the relevant CPS guidance (entitled ‘Sending Indictable Only Cases to the Crown Court and committal Proceedings’, dated 22 November 2007) which state “(t)here is currently no provision for sending defendants to the Crown Court in their absence”. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v]  Thus, even prior to the pandemic, women, particularly women of color, were not being elevated to leadership roles. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The CPS implies a connection between rappers and gang members that is wholly unsupported. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Morris pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity and was told to pay a £200 fine, a £34 victim surcharge and £105 costs to the CPS. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Coincidentally, the Divisional Court in Scottow v CPS has in the last few days issued a judgment in which it re9ferred to “the well-established proposition that free speech encompasses the right to offend, and indeed to abuse another”. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 6:42 am by Cyberleagle
The government has now published the Final Response to its Consultation on the April 2019 Online Harms White Paper. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Nelson Tebbe
By Netta Barak-Corren and Nelson TebbeOn November 4, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The Press Gazette had a piece “Max Mosley sues Daily Mail for ‘malicious prosecution’ after it shared racist election leaflet with CPS”. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue,… [read post]