Search for: "Cabral's Case" Results 61 - 80 of 138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
The state high court transferred the case back to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, with instructions to reconsider in light of Cabral v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 10:33 am by Record on Appeal
SCWC-28669, a case we previously blogged about here and here. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Cabrales, and an exact alignment of the elements was no longer required. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:06 am by Russ Bensing
  He’d been convicted in 2006, and had lost his appeal, but the case got remanded for correction of post-release controls. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:39 am
Cabral (2007) 69 Mass.App.Ct. 68 [866 N.E.2d 429, 433] could not claim to have a reasonable expectation of privacy in saliva he spat on a public sidewalk. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:06 am
Cabrales of why we have a constitutional venue provision, because [p]roper venue in criminal proceedings was a matter of concern to the Nation's founders. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  I’d questioned the continued vitality of Cabrales here, and last February discussed the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by Steve Hall
Cabrales in particular was very adamant that that’s not the kind of investigation the commission was intended for, and I think Ms. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 7:54 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
The practice of diplomatic assurancesNikos Frangakis, A State’s exceptional economic measures under the European Convention on Human Rights – The Case of the “Greek Memorandum”Erik Fribergh, The future of the Court after InterlakenKhanlar Hajiyev, The evolution of positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights – by the European Court of Human RightsSverre Erik Jebens, Illegally obtained evidence in criminal cases. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Several cases have, therefore, disallowed the inclusion of any of these expenses as part of the child support order in such circumstances. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:02 pm by Record on Appeal
Judge Ginoza issued 1 concurring opinion from an SDO in a criminal case State v. [read post]