Search for: "California First Bank v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2011, 1:50 pm by M. Scott Koller
While California is not the only state to have a statute like this on the books, it is certainly one of the first to hold that the DNA collection violates an individual's right to privacy. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 1:02 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Since the right of California cannabis delivery services was cemented late last year with the state supreme court’s ruling in County of Santa Cruz v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Maryland, where the John Marshall Supreme Court in 1819 ruled, first, that Congress had the constitutional power to create and charter the Bank of the United States, and, second, that the State of Maryland could not impose a discriminatory tax on the federal bank. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm by Mary Elizabeth Williams
Following the jury’s July decision, Goldsmith responded: “Graffiti remains vandalism in the state of California . . . . [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:50 pm by Scott Koller
While California is not the only state to have a statute like this on the books, it is certainly one of the first to hold that the DNA collection violates an individual’s right to privacy. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:41 am by Nassiri Law
She sued under a state human rights law (this occurred in Maine), and the bank was granted summary judgment by the district court. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
 One that on first glance may make a fair amount of sense. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 11:21 am by Venkat
") Hydra Group, which is headquartered in California, brought a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 3:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Gentry reached the California Supreme Court for the first time while it was considering another arbitration case called Discover Bank v. [read post]