Search for: "California Supreme Court and Its Judges from 1987 to Present"
Results 61 - 80
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court The U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
Salerno (1987), holding that a law could only be challenged on its face if "no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
At present, the SCA is that solution. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
On April 28, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 1987) (suspect who fled unlocked vehicle parked on public road abandoned expectation of privacy); see also Kurtz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:07 pm
To simply state an overall rate from 1973 to the present is highly misleading.In the early years, the primary reason for reversals was the Supreme Court's inability to agree with itself from one year to the next what the Constitution requires and what it forbids. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Super. 1987), also emphatically rejecting applicability of implied warranty to prescription drugs. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
The Arizona Supreme Court has expressly declined to rule on this issue. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 2:34 pm
Generally speaking (though with some potential exceptions), the answer is Oklahoma law, as the California Supreme Court held in McCann v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm
McLemore, 978 S.W.2d 568, 571 (Texas Supreme Court 1998). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
McLemore, 978 S.W.2d 568, 571 (Texas Supreme Court 1998). [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am
Yet despite the acknowledged inadequacies of review of upon appeal from a final judgment, the California Supreme Court has made it clear that the prerogative writs should be used sparingly as a means of reviewing such orders. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Yet despite the acknowledged inadequacies of review of upon appeal from a final judgment, the California Supreme Court has made it clear that the prerogative writs should be used sparingly as a means of reviewing such orders. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
As the Supreme Court observed, albeit not in the product liability context, “[m]eaningful disclosure does not mean more disclosure. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Dazzled by what software makes possible—the highs—we have embedded into our lives a technological medium capable of bringing society to its knees, but from which we demand virtually no quality assurance. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
[Plaintiff] has failed to present a genuine dispu [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
My fear is that, as presently structured, "Elements of Law" is both too ambiguous to provide students with a sense of its place and value for their studies, and too marginal to suggest a valid reason for the use of precious faculty resources to service in a tightly structured first year curriculum. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed, finding that such boycotts were significantly expressive such that an ad hoc balancing of the competing interests presented in the particular case was necessary. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987),and Dolan v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Thus, in California, while “an FDA[] conclusion is not binding . [read post]
