Search for: "California v Mendoza"
Results 61 - 80
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2015, 6:36 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:27 am
Mendoza-Powers, 2012 U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:34 pm
Delaware, 2020) Filed 04/20/2020[Mexico][Petition granted] [Failure to exercise custodial rights not established]Monroy, v De Mendoza, 2019 WL 7630631 (U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:25 am
Nereida Mendoza, CV 08-05286 ODW (C.D. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:38 am
Finally, the court explained that employers are not forbidden from allowing employees who are aware of their entitlement to choose not to take a day of rest (Mendoza v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:14 am
California Supreme Court Decides Important “One Day’s Rest in Seven” Questions The California Supreme Court in Mendoza v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
" See, e.g., Iglesias-Mendoza v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:02 am
The Court appears to be holding Mendoza v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 11:24 pm
[UPDATE: The court has granted the California Channel's request to televise the Perry v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:11 am
In June 2013, the ACLU filed a class action lawsuit, Lopez-Venegas v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Mendoza-Powers, 2010 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Mendoza (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 721, 726-728) and unpaid meal and rest breaks (Cicairos v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
Mendoza (1988) 199 Cal.App.3d 721, 726-728) and unpaid meal and rest breaks (Cicairos v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
Barbara Mikulski says labor regulations go too far, maybe they go too far [Rachel Weiner, Washington Post] Lawsuit: California shouldn’t be letting private employees work seven days in a row whether they want to or not [Trevor Burrus, Cato; Mendoza v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:32 pm
Here are some of the cases from Update #23: Hansen v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:55 am
Would have reversed the California Supreme Court decision in Chavez v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
"That is the premise behind the fight in Valdez v. [read post]
25 May 2008, 8:18 pm
California 12-16-1957 Question: No question in Oyez, but see opinion here and hereMiscellaneous Issues:Seling v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
In 1991, he received a felony conviction for driving under the influence under California law and completed his sentence. [read post]
