Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,356
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 11:40 am
He contextualizes this technical intervention through the historical innovations that have made their mark in both courts and across the legal domain. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
And since we are in San Diego and I am a former California state securities regulator, let me throw in one more — Regulation CE, a Commission exemption for transactions exempt from qualification under Section 25102(n) of the California Corporations Code.[9] Each exemption differs on particular factors, such as whether general solicitation is permitted, the types of issuers that can use the exemption, the types of investors that can purchase under the exemption, the amount of… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
Many observers—including Epic CEO Tim Sweeney—have marked this as an unmitigated loss for Epic. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:40 am
Georgia Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tracie Cason's decision last week in Walters v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:46 am
Banc of California, National Association v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
" Id. at 334 (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Rogozinski v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the constitutionality of HB20 in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:07 am
County of El Dorado, California and Office of the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California, Vampire Family Brands accuses Treasury Wine Estates (“TWE”) of infringing upon marks owned by Vampire Family Brands, LLC. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:43 pm
California, but so far as I am concerned that would be a very good thing. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
“Plaintiff does not allege that any of the products that purportedly contain false advertising use its marks “Planet Green” or “Doorstepink. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In Alabama v. [read post]
