Search for: "California v. McGee"
Results 61 - 76
of 76
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Booker in 2005 ([origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]) and Cunningham v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles: The Court upheld a decision by California courts that a parish splitting off from the Episcopal Church could not take parish property with it. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
In its appeal (Campaign for California Families v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
Mike McGee of The Recorder covers what is by now familiar ground. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP:… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
E. coli bacteria: what are they, where did they come from, and why are some so dangerous? [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 3:06 pm
Supreme Court has placed McGee v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, fn. 11 [dicta stating "there is no rule requiring preservation of the original ratio between punitive damages and compensatory damages"].)But compare this decision to the Fifth Appellate District's opinion in McGee v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm
We previously blogged here about our firm's pending cert petition in McGee v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 11:12 am
A few months ago, in McGee v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 6:09 pm
He cited the Third District's ruling in People v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 9:33 pm
McGee, No. 06-611, 2007 WL 1469397 (S.D. [read post]
