Search for: "California v. Mullins"
Results 61 - 80
of 229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 9:05 am
“Rich is considered one of the top Jones Day trial attorneys in California. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:28 pm
*Mark Ross is an attorney in Sheppard Mullin’s San Francisco office. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:41 pm
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
Samsung, Arts Technica, Benchslaps, Bill Lee, California, Cellphones, Charles K. [read post]
16 May 2007, 11:00 am
This one-day program explores in detail the critical aspects of Wage & Hour litigation with a focus on California. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
The California Supreme Court had already held, in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:37 pm
In Ferra v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:24 pm
*Elyssa Sternberg is a law clerk in Sheppard Mullin’s Los Angeles office. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:45 am
Cotter and O’Connor v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:10 pm
In Brinker, the CA lower courts waited years for the California Supreme Court to make a ruling. [read post]
12 May 2011, 2:22 pm
On May 10, 2011, the Second Appellate District of California issued a favorable decision for employers in Flores v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 3:41 pm
Recent California Supreme Court Decisions Incentivize the Use of Facial Recognition In February 2020, the California Supreme Court announced its Opinion in Frlekin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
Other commentary focuses on Fisher v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:51 pm
Mission Capital Advisors LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:01 am
The good folks at Sheppard Mullin give us their view of the PPL Montana opinion. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 10:03 am
Paulek v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
In Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
Mar. 6, 2019) dismissed a claim under California’s Unruh Act that was based on the same facts as the plaintiff’s claim under the ADA. [read post]
