Search for: "California v. Ware"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 6:32 pm
As a federal judge, Ware has presided over some notable cases, such as Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:09 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:39 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Judge Ware dismisses the Facebook/Zynga referrer ID case with prejudice. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Federal Judge James Ware of the Northern District of California has certified a class of iPod purchasers, allowing an antitrust class action to proceed against Apple Computer, Inc. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 12:20 pm
Those issues arise in the case of Perry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:51 pm
(That case also carries the title Perry, et al., v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit extended its decision to keep sealed the videos from Perry v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 10:44 am
Schwarzenegger (the federal trial on California’s same-sex marriage initiative, Proposition 8). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:46 pm
LEXIS 24263, No. 02-5912 (Ware, J.) [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
In Larimer v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
Perry v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:39 am
Power Ventures -- Facebook v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Chief District Judge James Ware in San Francisco. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm
Multiple class action lawsuits were filed across the country, and these were all consolidated and transferred to Judge Ware in the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
Kendrick, 244 F. 3d 572, 578–579 (CA7 2001); Entertainment Soft-ware Assn. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
On Monday, the proponents of the anti-gay marriage Proposition 8 in California argued that the district court’s decision declaring Prop 8 unconstitutional in Perry v. [read post]
