Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
In the recent case of Jones v. [read post]
AMICUS CURIAE POSITION ADVOCATED FOR PENNSYLVANIA DEFENSE INSTITUTE PREVAILS AT SUPERIOR COURT LEVEL
16 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm
Holy Spirit Hospital has prevailed in the Superior Court as confirmed by the Court's Opinion handed down yesterday. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Last Friday, in Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:35 pm
By Anthony Rice In Salvato v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
But you could definitely allow this discovery, in my view, if you wanted to.Judging -- with all due respect to Chief Justice Roberts -- isn't just about calling balls and strikes. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:47 am
He also points out that--much as some courts have--the superiority analysis is a global one. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
The Appeals Court has affirmed a Superior Court judgment ordering that a house built in violation of both zoning and a previous Superior Court judgment be torn down. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 6:26 pm
by Dennis Crouch Superior Industries v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 8:39 am
Austin, Oct. 1, 2013, Androscoggin Superior Court More Blog Entries: Strout v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:34 pm
From yesterday's report of filings in San Francisco Superior Court: Tabitha Totah v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:36 am
In its recent April 17, 2012 decision in the Berg v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 7:18 pm
Though calls the latter issue a "tough nut to crack". [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
The trial court (San Diego Superior, Judge Nugent) certified the class, and the case was tried to the court. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 7:20 am
In the recent case of Jones v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:29 pm
(DMC No. 7209) (Pinal County Superior Court): Mr. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:46 pm
The Privette doctrine, so-called because of a case of the same name, Privette v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 7:51 pm
In a recent Ontario Superior Court decision, Adjemian v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:21 am
On March 1, 2016, a Snohomish County Superior Court Judge found that the ferry system had wrongfully denied payment of maintenance and ordered the Washington State Ferry system to pay 275 days of back maintenance to an injured ferry worker represented by Kraft Palmer Davies, P.L.L.C. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 10:38 am
., et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
A so-called 30A appeal was filed with the Superior Court under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 30A, Section 14, and the judge there did not overturn the denial. [read post]
