Search for: "Call v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal based its holding on the California Supreme Court's decision in California Dental Assn. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From last week's California Court of Appeal decision in Cusi v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's California Court of Appeal decision in Norway v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:54 pm
In October, 2023, the federal court remanded the case to the Superior Court of Gwinnett County, Georgia. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:23 am
This afternoon’s Superior Court ruling in Pennington v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 11:07 am
The Superior Court opinion coming down today in Reich v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:39 am
Kish v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
As a result, the trial court correctly found that the bus company wasn’t entitled to summary judgment on the respondeat superior claims. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Supreme Court issued Roper v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, the court heard the defendant’s application to strike out the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited KB-2023-003818. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
It also puts into context the superiority of the French approach regarding abortion, which is proven with the reversal of Roe. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
These individuals must bring a special application for release in the Superior Court of Justice for bail awaiting their case. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
These individuals must bring a special application for release in the Superior Court of Justice for bail awaiting their case. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
Central to their argument was what they called a "global" rule. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 12:33 pm
The trial judge had him at $60 an hour and the Superior Court is signaling “too much! [read post]
