Search for: "Campbell v. Secretary of State" Results 61 - 80 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Brandeis: A Life,” observes that Brandeis – the co-author of 1890 Harvard Law Review article, “The Right to Privacy,” and a dissenter in Olmstead v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 7:48 pm by Mehmet Munur
Such user failure combined with a weak logging and password feature resulted in the failure of the electronic signature.The case is similar to Campbell v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 1:12 am
Gould KINGS COUNTY Real Property Unsubstantiated Denial of Service Does Not Rebut Presumption of Valid Service on Secretary of State West Coast Realty Services Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
But, while the word ‘shall' is often mandatory, particularly when used in legislation, it has, depending on the context, been interpreted on occasion as directory or exhortatory only: see for example R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
May 4, 2006); Campbell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
May 4, 2006); Campbell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
May 4, 2006); Campbell v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Andrew Hamm
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:24 am by INFORRM
  Discusses the “populist wave directed at the European Court of Human Rights and European judges generally” resulting from the decision of the Supreme Court in R (F and FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 17 [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On The Privacy Perspective Blog Suneet Sharma has considered the development of UK privacy law following the Human Rights Act 1998 through to the landmark Campbell case. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
White, Illinois Secretary of State Issue: Whether a state's refusal to approve a "Choose Life" specialty license plate is content rather than viewpoint discrimination and violates the First Amendment and whether a specialty license plate program that grants authority to approve or reject new messages on plates is not facially invalid under the First Amendment if it vests that licensing authority in a legislative body. [read post]