Search for: "Campbell v. State of Indiana"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2009, 5:18 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:49 am
See Campbell v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human ServicesAtlanta Federal Center, Suite 3B7061 Forsyth Street, S.W.Atlanta, GA 30303-8909Voice Phone (404)562-7886FAX (404)562-7881TDD (404)331-2867Region V - Chicago (Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)Valerie Morgan-Alston, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
State of Indiana, a 12-page, 2-1 opinion, Judge Robb writes:We conclude sufficient evidence exists to support Matthew's conviction. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 10:31 am
" Campbell, who pushed the case, could not be reached for comment Monday. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
V. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:42 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Irvin Neal v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
" Robert Campbell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:19 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) John Carl Fultz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 11:09 am
State of Indiana , a 15-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Lavern Baltimore appeals his convictions for Burglary Resulting in Bodily Injury, a class A felony, and Sexual Battery,2 a class D felony. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004)...................2Oken v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 4:20 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Brian Campbell v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
See International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:16 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Tymetri Campbell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 9:42 am
Campbell v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:42 pm
The Indiana Court of Appeals described their theory like this:Here, it is undisputed that Edwina and Charles complied with the requisite statutes in obtaining and filing their Indiana marriage license and certificate with the clerk of the Ohio County Circuit Court.2 It is also undisputed that Reverend Campbell could have solemnized the marriage under Indiana law had the ceremony taken place in this State. [read post]
17 May 2007, 11:29 am
The Indiana Court of Appeals described their theory like this:Here, it is undisputed that Edwina and Charles complied with the requisite statutes in obtaining and filing their Indiana marriage license and certificate with the clerk of the Ohio County Circuit Court.2 It is also undisputed that Reverend Campbell could have solemnized the marriage under Indiana law had the ceremony taken place in this State. [read post]
