Search for: "Card+ v. US" Results 61 - 80 of 6,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
""... because the use of background designs on credit cards appears to be widespread, and because the tortoise shell design is clearly decorative in nature, the public will perceive the tortoise shell design as a version or a refinement of a commonly used form of decoration for credit cards, not as a trademark. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:36 am by Cyrus Farivar
(The second case was from the 3rd Circuit in July 2015, in a case known as US v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:55 am by Ed
On February 10, 2010, the California Supreme Court handed down its decision in Pineda v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am by Thomas Swartz
  And unfortunately, many cards have dormancy fees which decreased the value of the cards if they are not used within a certain time. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:08 am by Thomas Swartz
  And unfortunately, many cards have dormancy fees which decreased the value of the cards if they are not used within a certain time. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 7:58 am by Michael Froomkin
The NYT reports that Senators trying to hash out a bipartisan immigration bill have rejected using biometric ID cards to identify legal workers: The bipartisan group of eight senators is also still debating how to improve E-Verify, the system that employers use to check the immigration status of their workers. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
When you use a card at a store, you often swipe the card through a card reader. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm by Ronald Mann
Specifically, some merchants would like to persuade customers not to use credit cards by charging more when they do so. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:11 pm by Joy Waltemath
Limited liability for unauthorized use: Payroll card holders’ liability for unauthorized use of their cards is limited, provided the unauthorized use is reported within a certain period of time. [read post]