Search for: "Carrier v. Russell" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
The evidence was that Appellant might recommend a carrier; however, the customer ultimately chooses the carrier, and the contract is between the carrier and the customer. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:46 pm by Anna Christensen
  [Disclosure:  Akin Gump and Howe & Russell represent the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by Erin Miller
— In Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
Regal-Beloit Corporation (08-1553; 08-1554) — application of federal law to terms of shipment agreements between cargo carriers and their customers Magwood v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:59 pm
Opinion below (Supreme Court of Alaska) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1428 Title: Burkey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply [Howe & Russell represents the petitioner] Docket: 08-1202 Title: IMS Health, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
(in support of petitioner) Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-626 Title: Level 3 Communications, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
(Howe & Russell represents the petitioner.) [read post]