Search for: "Carroll v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Jean Carroll v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:00 am
Moss v. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 6:20 pm
Trump sued, arguing that the jury had found him not guilty of rape but only guilty of sexual abuse; ABC argued that, in context, the jury in Carroll v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:35 am
United States, in which Justice Antonin Scalia issued a statement regarding the denial. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 4:23 pm
App. 1944) (applying predecessor statute); Carroll v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:14 am
Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, if an employee of the government harms someone while acting in the scope of employment, the United States is substituted as the defendant and is subject to any liability resulting from the suit. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:58 am
That day is soon to come, as the Court considers United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
But as the Sixth Circuit noted in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Shawn Still (1:23-cv-03792) (civil removal proceedings) Mar-a-Lago (MAL): United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
KEYNOTE Introduced by Michael Carroll, Professor of Law and Director, Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, American University Washington College of Law Justin Hughes, Senior Advisor to the Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property, Head of United States Delegation to the World Intellectual Property Organization, and Professor of Law at Yeshiva University Cardozo School of Law In Geneva, working on GRTKF: Genetic resources, traditional… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
” He suggested that such an interpretation would “expose the United States to expansive damages” – an approach that “Congress would not have taken lightly. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:21 am
From Carroll v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
Iowa 2004) (upholding a catheterization performed by hospital personnel on a person detained under the police community-caretaking function); see also United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:34 pm
, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 pm
Supreme Court first identified an “automobile exception” in 1925 in Carroll v. [read post]
