Search for: "Caruso v. Caruso" Results 61 - 80 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject that contention inasmuch as the statute of limitations was tolled by the doctrine of continuous representation during the time that the same attorney represented plaintiffs in the underlying action (see [*2]Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7, affd ___ NY3d ___ [May 11, 2010]; HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, 63 AD3d 534, 535)"   [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We reject that contention inasmuch as the statute of limitations was tolled by the doctrine of continuous representation during the time that the same attorney represented plaintiffs in the underlying action (see [*2]Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 7, affd ___ NY3d ___ [May 11, 2010]; HNH Intl., Ltd. v Pryor Cashman Sherman & Flynn LLP, 63 AD3d 534, 535)"   [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rzepka initiated an action on behalf of Yar-Lo against Travelers in December 2006 that was dismissed by Supreme Court (Caruso, J.) upon summary judgment, which order this Court affirmed (Yar-Lo, Inc. v Travelers Indem. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
[Naomi Schaefer Riley, Acculturated, quotes me] “The Libertarian Lawyer Who Battled Jim Crow” [Damon Root on Moorfield Storey and Buchanan v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Caruso, 68 A.D.3d 1, 5 (1st Dep’t 2009), aff’d, 14 N.Y.3d 874 (2010). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
The search in this case was within the "workplace" exception to the warrant requirement recognized in O'Connor v Ortega (480 US 709) and Matter of Caruso v Ward (72 NY2d 432). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm by Edward Smith
Chris Caruso, a GM Engineer, testified in the case of  Lee v Silviera that the data referred to above was never designed to be used in accident reconstruction. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The claim should also be reinstated against Herrick Feinstein (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1, 6-7 [1st Dept 2009] [finding that sound policy considerations support the tolling of the statute of limitations under the continuous representation doctrine while the representation of the same matter in which the malpractice is alleged is ongoing], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by admin
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:55 am by David Oscar Markus
  His lawyers, the great Michael Caruso and wonderful Sowmya Bharathi, repeatedly said he was innocent. [read post]