Search for: "Case v. Colvin" Results 61 - 80 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2016, 9:46 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., August 24, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits and supplemental security income) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:11 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., August 10, 2016) (affirming denial of attorneys' fees, but reversing the district court's order dismissing Ridgell-Boltz's hostile-work-environment claim)*Chung v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:44 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: SSDI Hearing Backlog Exceeds 1.1 Million with Disabilities, Wait Time Nears Two Years For Tens Of Thousands, July 22, 2016, WDRB.com More Blog Entries: Attmore v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming denial ofreview of ALJ determination that Ray was not impaired, as Ray failed to showany basis for reversal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 4:23 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin: SSDI Appeals, June 25, 2016, Boston SSDI Lawyer Blog The post Why Was My Social Security Disability Claim Rejected? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:35 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 12, 2016) (affirming denial of disability and supplemental security benefits because the agency applied the correct legal standards and its findings were supported by substantial evidence) [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 12:53 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., July 1, 2016) (affirming denial of benefits because of continuing ability to function in various jobs)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:36 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Ex-NYPD cop admits he stole over $600G in disability benefits, June 9, 2016, Daily News, By Victoria Bekeimpis More Blog Entries: Allensworth v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:21 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., June 2, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits: the administrative law judge's reasons for discounting the relevant medical opinions were neither insufficient nor illegitimate)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]