Search for: "Case v. Shepherd" Results 61 - 80 of 557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
Three weeks ago, I wrote about the Bak v Rostek case in Brooklyn Supreme Court addressing the duty to disclose third-party offers amidst buy-out negotiations between co-owners. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Texas Supreme Court considered both of these questions this week in the case of Powell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
Nor does it describe the NCD as the statutorily-required instigator of, or shepherd for, such processes. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 10:25 am
"[J]udicial records, as well as documents reflecting out-of-court transactions such as mortgages, deeds, contracts, and any other papers, the contents of which are essentially undeniable, would qualify as documentary evidence in the proper case" (Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d at 84-85 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cives Corp. v George A. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am by Amy Howe
The archdiocese wanted to promote its campaign on public buses with an advertisement that featured three shepherds, sheep and the words “Find the Perfect Gift. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am by John Elwood
Its proposed advertisement depicted the silhouette of three shepherds and sheep accompanied by the message: “Find the Perfect Gift. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
 BackgroundThe case concerned the marks pictured, in respect of which registration was sought in Class 32:In August 2016, the second defendant in the case, Voltino (a Bulgarian company, judgment against which was obtained in October 2019) filed an application for an EU trade mark bearing the double ram and golden sun device shown, together with the words “Big Horn” to be used for goods including energy drinks and various types of water. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
This week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 7:10 am by Shannon O'Hare
The post Claridge’s Hotel Limited v Claridge Candles Limited & Denise Shepherd [2019] EWHC 2003 (IPEC) appeared first on Brown Rudnick. [read post]