Search for: "Central Bank v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 1,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2012, 6:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In December 2003, Petitioner, an Italian citizen, met Respondent, a United States citizen, in New York. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 When the notes failed, Singapore’s de facto central bank stepped in and mandated that HLF pay its investors over $32 million. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The Supreme Court has previously applied federal common law to give effect to the FSIA in First National City Bank v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:41 am by Felix Shipkevich
Clearing Houses Will be Required to Submit “Living Wills”Following in the footsteps of nine major banks doing business in the United States, clearing houses will be required to create detailed plans to be followed in the event that they need to be rescued or liquidated, global regulators said on Tuesday. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
That interpretive perspective was central to Justice Kennedy’s reading of the subsequent history of the application of ATS by the courts during the glory days of judicial internationalism grounded in an expansive interpretation of ATS starting with Filartiga v v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 11:51 am
Accretive LLC, United States District Court, Central District of California A press release from the law firm filing the complaint: New York, NY — September 15, 2009 — The law firm of Milberg LLP has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of all persons who used NAF's arbitration services during the period from June 1, 2006 to the present, inclusive… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
This is thanks to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
So the plaintiffs moved for leave to serve the German central bank by alternate means. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The transactions at issue in this case were not subject to Rule 105 because while the short sales took place on the NYSE, the activities related to the subsequent purchase of the same securities in an offering occurred entirely outside of the United States (SEC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Consequently, these pending Central District cases are worthy of focus since any final rulings upholding the position asserted by the Federal banking agencies could have far flung effects. [read post]