Search for: "Certain v. Potter"
Results 61 - 80
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
The judgment will determine whether the taxpayer’s sale of certain property to an unconnected purchaser was a supply exempt from value added tax under Schedule 10 to the VAT Act 1994. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 4:20 am
This is on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1564, and considers whether the Secretary of State can direct the Office of Communications not to introduce regulations exempting certain wireless telegraphy equipment from a licensing requirement on national security grounds. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:51 am
Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography in Jacobellis v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Yesterday’s opinion in Welch v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
An attorney discharged without cause may seek recovery in quantum meruit for the reasonable value of his or her services (Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v Gelmin, 235 AD2d 218,219 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm
In the Bloomsbury case, the unknown person was an individual who had stolen an advance copy of a Harry Potter novel which had come into the possession of The Sun. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:18 am
One is tempted to quote from Harry Potter: "neither can win while the other survives. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
Luis v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am
UK (1990) 67 DR 244, Matky v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
But I am reasonably certain that the doctrine of independent legal significance has never been used in a context like the one proposed in Crawford. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:26 am
Supreme Court decision in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:45 pm
" Jacobellis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:37 am
v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:56 am
Dellinger v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am
The Court will determine whether the Secretary of State can direct the Office of Communications (Ofcom) not to introduce regulations exempting certain wireless telegraphy equipment from a licensing requirement on national security grounds. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 3:08 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/11/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Justice Potter Stewart first broached this possibility in 1967 in his concurring opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
