Search for: "Chance et al v. United States of America" Results 61 - 80 of 100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm by Marjorie Dannenfelser
This spirited contest is truly at the heart of the meaning of liberty in America – all parties should welcome it, and with it, the chance to save countless lives. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
Twin America, LLC, et. al, Twin America, Coach, and City Sights together were required to pay $7.5 million in disgorgement to remedy alleged violations of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as well as New York State law, including the Donnelly Act (see Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am by Jeralyn
Chigbo Peter Umeh, et. al. , Case No. 09 cr 00524, Southern District of New York), no cocaine was ever shipped to Africa, let alone to the U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, which upheld mandatory minimums against an Apprendi challenge. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:00 am by David Kopel
In the United States, though, the test was prohibited by the sclerotic Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am by Soroush Seifi
However, after certification of a bargaining unit and a union – the contractual nature fails since “…it is [not] possible to speak of individual contracts of employment and to treat the collective agreement as a mere appendage of individual relationships. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:27 am by David Post
The United States of America has a government of laws and not of men. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am by Dan Harris
 Leung Tak Lun, et al., 944 F.2d 642 (9th Cir. 1991) but advised the United States that its grant of authority for that one deposition should not be regarded as precedent and there has been no subsequent record of China permitting a deposition. [read post]