Search for: "Chancellor v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
While not without its critics (read here Widener Law Professor Ann Conaway's commentary), the core of Chancellor Strine's opinion last month in Auriga Capital v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:27 pm by Christopher Spizzirri
In considering the issues, the Court looks to Vice Chancellor Parsons’ decision in Triton v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Finally, the charging of higher fees for certain types of claim more likely to be brought by women was indirectly discriminatory, with the measures not justified as a proportionate means of achieving the stated aims of the fees regime. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm by Giles Peaker
The problem here was the high threshold of evidence set out in R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor [2014] EWHC 218 (Admin), reported at [2014] ICR 498, R (Tabbakh) v Staffordshire and West Midlands Probation Trust [2014] EWCA Civ 827, and the second Unison case, R (Unison) v Lord Chancellor (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 4198 (Admin). [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm by Lucy Reed
X v UK is inconsistent with other more persuasive authorities like Airey v Ireland, Steel & Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22,  and W v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 29 which, significantly, is a family law authority. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:18 am by jonathanturley
” Now the dean and chancellor of University of California Hastings College of the Law David Faigman is questioning the legitimacy of the Court after the ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:24 am by Carl Neff
 Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]