Search for: "Cheek v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 10:41 am
On June 3, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Wood v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Randall Hodgkinson won in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Cheek (Eviction Order Appeal) Lambert v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:17 am
(See United States V. [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:24 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm
After charges were formally filed, Maryland state officials collected a sample of his DNA by means of a swab of the inside of his cheek. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:26 pm
Iran v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
In a recent post, Mike Dorf (tongue firmly in self-referential cheek) announced "Dorf's Law," which "states that courts do not provide a remedy for really really big constitutional problems where doing so would create chaos. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:46 am
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:05 pm
” Stewart v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:12 am
Diaz-Romero v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:05 pm
Using state law, they swabbed King's cheek to get a DNA sample, and then submitted the sample to the federal DNA database to see if there were any matches. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:41 pm
In criminal context, see United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
In Woodward v Grice [2017] EWHC 1292 (QB) the High Court considered the appropriate level of damages to award against a fan of the club for libellous statements made on an online forum. [read post]
