Search for: "Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These topics both reveal the imperial nature of expansion and help to explain the difficulties in recognizing it as such.Chief Justice John Marshall famously ruled in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am by Gregory Forman
 Four months later Brown, a member of the Cherokee nation and an Oklahoma resident, sought a finding of paternity and custody. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Leavitt, the first ISDEAA contract support costs case, and United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ross, 52 U.S. 362 (1850) (damages claim against Cherokee Principal Chief arising from Cherokee Removal). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ross, 52 U.S. 362 (1850) (damages claim against Cherokee Principal Chief arising from Cherokee Removal). [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am by John Floyd
  In a precursor to its infamous Dred Scott decision, the Supreme Court in 1831 in Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield     Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm by David Strifling
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, 480 U.S. 700, 704-05 (1987) (citing Lewis Blue Point Oyster Cultivation Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University  COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]